Schriber v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Schriber v. State

1912 OK CR 378, 126 P. 582, 8 Okla. Crim. 69, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 381

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 14, 1912

DocketNo. A-1376.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 378 (Schriber v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schriber v. State, 1912 OK CR 378, 126 P. 582, 8 Okla. Crim. 69, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 381 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

FURMAN, P. J.

Appellant was convicted in the superior court of Garfield county for an assault to do bodily harm, and his punishment was assessed at seven months’ confinement in the county jail.

The appeal in this case was perfected in this court on September 9, 1911. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant, nor has any appearance been made in this court by any counsel representing him. We therefore have a right to assume that this appeal was taken for delay only. We have examined the record, and fail to find any errors therein. The testimony of appellant’s guilt is overwhelming.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FURMAN, P. J.

Appellant was convicted in the superior court of Garfield county for an assault to do bodily harm, and his punishment was assessed at seven months’ confinement in the county jail.

The appeal in this case was perfected in this court on September 9, 1911. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant, nor has any appearance been made in this court by any counsel representing him. We therefore have a right to assume that this appeal was taken for delay only. We have examined the record, and fail to find any errors therein. The testimony of appellant’s guilt is overwhelming.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 378, 126 P. 582, 8 Okla. Crim. 69, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schriber-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.