Schreyer v. Village of Tuckahoe

90 A.D.2d 828, 456 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19074

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, in which the defendant Village of Tuckahoe, inter alia, served a third-party complaint upon Pfaff & Kendall Co., said defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Slifkin, J.), dated October 9,1981, which granted a motion by the third-party defendant Pfaff & Kendall Co., pursuant to CPLR 1010, to sever the third-party action from the main action. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Considering the record in its entirety, we are of the view that Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the severance (see Cipollina v Kent, 52 AD2d 632; Todd v Gull Contr. Co., 22 AD2d 904; see, also, Strange v Sampson, 73 AD2d 749; Vita Food Prods. v Epstein & Sons, 52 AD2d 522). Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schreyer v. Village of Tuckahoe, 90 A.D.2d 828, 456 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

90 A.D.2d 828 (Schreyer v. Village of Tuckahoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Todd v. Gull Contracting Co.
22 A.D.2d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Vita Food Products, Inc. v. A. Epstein & Sons, Inc.
52 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Cipollina v. Kent
52 A.D.2d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Strange v. Sampson
73 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)