Schreiner v. United States

6 Ct. Cl. 359
United States Court of Claims·Decided December 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Loring-, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The petitioners, a mercantile firm in Savannah, claim of the United States the net proceeds of forty-three bales of upland cotton.

The fact found, that the loyalty of Hermann L. Schreiner is not proved, prevents a judgment in his favor or in which he could take a legal interest. And we cannot sever his copart-ners from him without ascertaining their individual interests. And to do this the business of the firm must be closed, its assets collected, its debts paid, and the residuum of property ascertained and reduced to cash. And then there would be required a settlement of the account of each partner with the firm, to ascertain his interest in this residuum, and to determine whether he was creditor or debtor. We have not the means for all this, nor the power of enforcing it.

Pecic, J., did not take any part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schreiner v. United States, 6 Ct. Cl. 359 (cc 1870).

6 Ct. Cl. 359 (Schreiner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kalamazoo Trust Co. v. Merrill
124 N.W. 597 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)