Schreiber v. Whitney
60 Cal. 431, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 486
Opinion
The document in the transcript, purporting to be a statement on motion for new trial, is not signed and certified by the Judge of the Court below, as required by Sub. 4, Sec. 659, C. C. P., and must be disregarded.
There is no error in the judgment roll.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schreiber v. Whitney, 60 Cal. 431, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 486 (Cal. 1882).
60 Cal. 431 (Schreiber v. Whitney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parrott v. City of Hot Springs
68 N.W. 329 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1896)
Slater v. Union Pacific Railway Co.
8 Utah 178 (Utah Supreme Court, 1892)
Scherrer v. Hale
9 Mont. 63 (Montana Supreme Court, 1889)
Raymond v. Thexton
7 Mont. 299 (Montana Supreme Court, 1888)
Adams v. Dohrmann
63 Cal. 417 (California Supreme Court, 1883)