Schreiber v. Drosness

135 A. 920, 100 N.J. Eq. 591, 15 Stock. 591, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 635
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 31, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 135 A. 920 (Schreiber v. Drosness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schreiber v. Drosness, 135 A. 920, 100 N.J. Eq. 591, 15 Stock. 591, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 635 (N.J. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tkenchabd, Mintubn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlbnnon, Kays, I-Ieteield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKinney v. Burman Properties, Inc.
79 F. Supp. 787 (District of Columbia, 1948)
McComb v. Hanly
16 A.2d 74 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A. 920, 100 N.J. Eq. 591, 15 Stock. 591, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schreiber-v-drosness-nj-1927.