Schreiber v. Commissioner
This text of 160 F.2d 108 (Schreiber v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was heard and submitted upon transcript of record, oral arguments and printed briefs of attorneys for the contending parties;
And it appearing that the findings of fact of the Tax Court of the United States are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of law reached in the opinion of that tribunal conform to the principles announced in Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532, and Lusthaus v. Commissioner, 327 U.S. 293, 66 S.Ct. 539, and are rationalized upon sound reasoning [See Dobson v. Commissioner, 320 U.S. 489, 64 S.Ct. 239, 88 L.Ed. 248];
The decision of the Tax Court, 6 T.C. 707, in the case of Abe Schreiber v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is affirmed; likewise, the decision of the Tax Court in the case of J. C. Shaprow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 F.2d 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schreiber-v-commissioner-ca6-1947.