Schreiber h/w, Pets. v. Hon.
This text of Schreiber h/w, Pets. v. Hon. (Schreiber h/w, Pets. v. Hon.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
PAUL SCHREIBER AND LORA : No. 100 WM 2019 SCHREIBER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : HON. DONALD R. WALKO, JR., COURT : OF COMMON PLEAS, FIFTH JUDICIAL : DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY : OF ALLEGHENY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is
DENIED, and the Application for Leave to Intervene is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The
Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schreiber h/w, Pets. v. Hon., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schreiber-hw-pets-v-hon-pa-2019.