Schreckengost v. Montgomery

Ohio Supreme Court

Schreckengost v. Montgomery

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 165

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 29, 1964

DocketNo. 38427

StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 165 (Schreckengost v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schreckengost v. Montgomery, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 165 (Ohio 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The two-issue rule is not applicable. There is but one cause of action, and it is based on the claimed negligence of defendant resulting in a single loss and damage. Separate specifications of negligence provide no basis for the application of the two-issue rule. Claypool v. Mohawk Motor, Inc., 155 Ohio St., 8.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Kovachy, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Kovachy, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI