Schramm v. State

549 S.E.2d 402, 274 Ga. 113
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 16, 2001
DocketS01A1165
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 549 S.E.2d 402 (Schramm v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schramm v. State, 549 S.E.2d 402, 274 Ga. 113 (Ga. 2001).

Opinion

Benham, Justice.

While a pedestrian on a McDuffie County road, Kyle Conrad White III was struck and killed by a van driven by appellant Matthew David Schramm. Schramm was convicted of malice murder in connection with White’s death, as well as the aggravated assault of Charles William Odum, who was walking with White.1

Odum testified he and White saw the van driven by appellant coming at them and that it accelerated as it left the road and bore down on them, causing Odum to believe they were going to die. When the van struck the victim, his head cracked the windshield and his [114]*114body landed 83 feet away. He died as a result of the massive head injuries he sustained. Both Odum and a friend of appellant testified about the hostility between the victim and appellant that had developed as a result of appellant’s girlfriend having become romantically involved with the victim. Appellant’s friend testified that, several months before the victim was killed, appellant fired a shotgun in the direction of the victim’s home while the victim was standing in the front yard, and that appellant, while driving the van, had chased the victim who was riding a motorcycle down a dirt road, hitting the motorcycle two or three times. There was testimony that appellant had several times threatened to kill the victim. While appellant asserted that the victim’s death was the result of a problem with the van’s steering column, an accident reconstruction expert testified that the crime scene was not consistent with mechanical failure. Contrary to appellant’s contention, the evidence was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to conclude that appellant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of malice murder and aggravated assault. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). See also Chester v. State, 262 Ga. 85 (1) (414 SE2d 477) (1992).

Decided July 16, 2001. Lucy J. Bell, for appellant. Dennis C. Sanders, District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Ruth M. Bebko, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryson v. State
638 S.E.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Dickens v. State
627 S.E.2d 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
549 S.E.2d 402, 274 Ga. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schramm-v-state-ga-2001.