Schramm v. Murdock-Salter Chevrolet Company

312 F.2d 249, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3306
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 1962
Docket6996_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 312 F.2d 249 (Schramm v. Murdock-Salter Chevrolet Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schramm v. Murdock-Salter Chevrolet Company, 312 F.2d 249, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3306 (10th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

312 F.2d 249

Raymond M. SCHRAMM and Diane Schramm, Appellants,
v.
MURDOCK-SALTER CHEVROLET COMPANY, Stanley Oakes, Midtown
Motors, Inc., Garth Cameron, B. A. Todkill,
Todkill Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., and
Cooper Oldsmobile, Inc., Appellees.

No. 6996.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1962.

Before PICKETT, BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained because the record contains no final judgment disposing of the claim asserted by the appellants against the appellees. We suggest that on remand the district court reconsider its order on the motions to quash in the light of such decisions as Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731, 735, 67 S.Ct. 1009, 91 L.Ed. 1209; and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Railway Express Agency, 6 Cir., 253 F.2d 780, 784; and in the light of the principles stated in 1A Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure, 355, p. 352; and 2 Moore's Federal Practice, 12.16, p. 222 of 1961 supplement. Time for appeal of any judgment entered after remand shall run from the entry of that judgment.

Pete V. Domenici, Albuquerque, N.M. (Gino J. Matteucci and Richard C. Civerolo, Albuquerque, N.M., were with him on the brief), for appellants.

Jackson G. Akin, of Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, Albuquerque, N.M., for appellees Murdock-Salyer Chevrolet Co. and Garth Cameron.

Michael L. Keleher, Albuquerque, N.M. (W. A. Keleher, A. H. McLeod and Russell Moore, Albuquerque, N.M., were with him on the brief), for appellees Stanley Oakes and Midtown Motors, Inc.

Joseph B. Zucht, Albuquerque, N.M. (Joseph G. Whitehouse, Albuquerque, N.M., was with him on the brief), for appellees B. A. Todkill and Todkill Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.

Vance Mauney, of Botts, Botts & Mauney, Albuquerque, N.M. (Gerald R. Cole, Santa Fe, N.M., was with him on the brief), for appellee Cooper Oldsmobile, Inc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schramm v. El-Khatib
409 P.2d 888 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
312 F.2d 249, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schramm-v-murdock-salter-chevrolet-company-ca10-1962.