Schrader v. United States

180 F. 953, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5541
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1910
DocketNo. 5,178
StatusPublished

This text of 180 F. 953 (Schrader v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schrader v. United States, 180 F. 953, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5541 (circtsdny 1910).

Opinion

HAZEL, District Judge.

The articles in question are fountain pens without the pen points, and not “penholders,” as that term is commonly understood in trade and commerce. According to the Century Dictionary a penholder consists of—

“A holder for pens or pen points; a handle or stock, with a device for retaining the pen; usually socket of metal.”

There is no satisfactory evidence in the record to show that the article has any different commercial understanding. Duty was properly assessed at 35 per cent, ad valorem, under paragraph 450 of the tariff act of 1897, as manufactures of hard rubber.

The decision of the Board is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 F. 953, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schrader-v-united-states-circtsdny-1910.