Schrader v. State
This text of 782 So. 2d 967 (Schrader v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the order revoking defendant’s probation for failure to submit to urinalysis upon the probation officer’s request. See Manon v. State, 740 So.2d 1253, 1256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(whether probationer’s violation is willful and substantial is question of fact; trial court’s determination will not be overturned unless there is no supporting evidence). However, we strike that portion of the order finding that defendant violated probation by failing to pay costs of supervision. As the state properly concedes, the court granted defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal as to that alleged violation.
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
782 So. 2d 967, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4774, 2001 WL 357015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schrader-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.