Schrack v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schrack v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

572 S.W.3d 596

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 30, 2019·No. WD 82149·Published

Opinion

Per curiam:

Brenda Schrack ("Schrack") appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's ("Commission") order denying her claim for unemployment benefits following her termination from Crossmark, Inc. ("Crossmark"). Schrack argues that the Commission erred in concluding that she committed misconduct and in denying her claim for unemployment benefits because Crossmark failed to meet its burden by supplying sufficient competent evidence. We affirm the Commission's decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Brenda Schrack ("Schrack") appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's ("Commission") order denying her claim for unemployment benefits following her termination from Crossmark, Inc. ("Crossmark"). Schrack argues that the Commission erred in concluding that she committed misconduct and in denying her claim for unemployment benefits because Crossmark failed to meet its burden by supplying sufficient competent evidence. We affirm the Commission's decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Schrack v. Div. of Emp't Sec., 572 S.W.3d 596 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

572 S.W.3d 596 (Schrack v. Div. of Emp't Sec.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.