Schrack v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schrack v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

572 S.W.3d 596

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 30, 2019

DocketWD 82149

StatusPublished

This text of 572 S.W.3d 596 (Schrack v. Div. of Emp't Sec.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schrack v. Div. of Emp't Sec., 572 S.W.3d 596 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Brenda Schrack ("Schrack") appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's ("Commission") order denying her claim for unemployment benefits following her termination from Crossmark, Inc. ("Crossmark"). Schrack argues that the Commission erred in concluding that she committed misconduct and in denying her claim for unemployment benefits because Crossmark failed to meet its burden by supplying sufficient competent evidence. We affirm the Commission's decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Brenda Schrack ("Schrack") appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's ("Commission") order denying her claim for unemployment benefits following her termination from Crossmark, Inc. ("Crossmark"). Schrack argues that the Commission erred in concluding that she committed misconduct and in denying her claim for unemployment benefits because Crossmark failed to meet its burden by supplying sufficient competent evidence. We affirm the Commission's decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 S.W.3d 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schrack-v-div-of-empt-sec-moctapp-2019.