Schour v. Aetna Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schour v. Aetna Insurance

50 A.D.2d 530, 375 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12241

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 530 (Schour v. Aetna Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schour v. Aetna Insurance, 50 A.D.2d 530, 375 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 2, 1975, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $40 costs and disbursements to respondents. It was not an abuse of discretion for the court to refuse to sever various aspects of this case and thereby fragment its disposition. No prejudice has been shown to flow from this ruling except possibly as to defendant-appellant Aetna’s right to depose third-party defendant-respondent Royal. As to this aspect of the matter, we direct that, if appellant moves with due alacrity, this case being on the eve of trial, such examination be permitted. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Nunez and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 2, 1975, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $40 costs and disbursements to respondents. It was not an abuse of discretion for the court to refuse to sever various aspects of this case and thereby fragment its disposition. No prejudice has been shown to flow from this ruling except possibly as to defendant-appellant Aetna’s right to depose third-party defendant-respondent Royal. As to this aspect of the matter, we direct that, if appellant moves with due alacrity, this case being on the eve of trial, such examination be permitted. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Nunez and Yesawich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 530, 375 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schour-v-aetna-insurance-nyappdiv-1975.