Schottler v. State

388 F. App'x 547
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJuly 28, 2010
DocketNo. 10-1820
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 388 F. App'x 547 (Schottler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schottler v. State, 388 F. App'x 547 (7th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

Pro se litigant Pat Schottler filed a complaint seeking from the State of Wisconsin, among other things, $10,000 and the names of people who he says are tormenting him. He alleges that “someone” has inserted a metal pin in his head and is “wringing out” his brain; yet, he continues, the state’s attorney general and local police officials have ignored his pleas for assistance. Schottler did not pay the filing fee, so the district court inferred that he was seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis and then dismissed the lawsuit because it is factually frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)®. Schottler appeals, but the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the “fan[548]*548tastic or delusional scenarios” described in his complaint lack an arguable basis in fact. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); see also Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 118 L.Ed.2d 340 (1992); Gladney v. Pendleton Corr. Facility, 302 F.3d 773, 774-75 (7th Cir.2002).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Bogenschutz
N.D. Indiana, 2024
Smith v. Galipeau
N.D. Indiana, 2023

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 F. App'x 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schottler-v-state-ca7-2010.