Schorsch v. Miller

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT October 22, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

JAMES SCHORSCH, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-323 § ISAAC KWARTENG, et al, § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF On September 17, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief” (M&R, D.E. 81). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 81), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the motion for preliminary injunctive relief (D.E. 70) is DENIED. ORDERED this 22nd day of October, 2021. JL GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2