Schorr v. Eisenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schorr v. Eisenberg

243 A.D. 638

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 638 (Schorr v. Eisenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schorr v. Eisenberg, 243 A.D. 638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order is so far as it vacates and sets aside an order of warrant and seizure affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Young, Scudder, Tompldns and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal and a denial of the motion, except in so far as it seeks an increase in the amount of the seizure undertaking, for which purpose the matter should be remitted to Special Term. Defendant had defaulted in making payment under the chattel mortgage prior to the service of the third party order. Plaintiff was entitled to the warrant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order is so far as it vacates and sets aside an order of warrant and seizure affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Young, Scudder, Tompldns and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal and a denial of the motion, except in so far as it seeks an increase in the amount of the seizure undertaking, for which purpose the matter should be remitted to Special Term. Defendant had defaulted in making payment under the chattel mortgage prior to the service of the third party order. Plaintiff was entitled to the warrant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schorr-v-eisenberg-nyappdiv-1935.