Schornak v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
This text of 742 N.W.2d 355 (Schornak v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raymond SCHORNAK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall include among the issues addressed whether the plaintiff's medical proofs satisfied his burden of proving that the damage done to his heart by the work he performed during the course of his heart attack was medically distinguishable and that the condition of his heart was made significantly worse than it would have been without performance of the work. If the Court of Appeals answers this question in the affirmative, it shall specifically identify the evidence it relied upon to reach that conclusion. MCL 418.301(2); Rakestraw v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc., 469 Mich. 220, 666 N.W.2d 199 (2003); Fahr v. General Motors Corp., 478 Mich. 922, 733 N.W.2d 22 (2007).
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
742 N.W.2d 355, 480 Mich. 1000, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 3245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schornak-v-daimlerchrysler-corp-mich-2007.