Schor v. Allegheny Cab Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Schor v. Allegheny Cab Co.

170 Misc. 205, 9 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1513

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 170 Misc. 205 (Schor v. Allegheny Cab Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schor v. Allegheny Cab Co., 170 Misc. 205, 9 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a reading of the record and in view of the fact that the defendant was compelled by law to carry insurance, it was error for the court to Set aside the verdict of the jury because the defendant’s witness in answer to a question stated that an insurance company took care of filing the report required by law.

Order reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and verdict reinstated.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Frankenthalbb and Noonan, JJ. -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon a reading of the record and in view of the fact that the defendant was compelled by law to carry insurance, it was error for the court to Set aside the verdict of the jury because the defendant’s witness in answer to a question stated that an insurance company took care of filing the report required by law.

Order reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and verdict reinstated.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Frankenthalbb and Noonan, JJ. -

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 Misc. 205, 9 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schor-v-allegheny-cab-co-nyappterm-1939.