School Reform Commission v. Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, Local 3

95 A.3d 269, 626 Pa. 115, 2014 WL 2922390, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1594
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 26, 2014·No. No. 47 EM 2014·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief filed by the Pennsylvania Department of Education and the Acting Secretary of Education, the Application for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief filed by the Alliance for Philadelphia Public Schools, the Application for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief filed by Students-First, and the Application for Leave to File Amended Statement of Amicus Curiae Senator Lawrence M. Farnese et al, the Application for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Petitioners, filed by Philadelphia School Partnership and PennCAN, and the Application for Leave to File a Statement of Amicus Curiae in Support of Response, filed by Robert M. McCord, are GRANTED. The Application for Leave to File Reply is GRANTED. The Application for Leave to File Original Process and Exclusive Jurisdiction Complaint for Declaratory Judgment is DENIED.

Chief Justice CASTILLE files a dissenting statement which is joined by Justice BAER.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

School Reform Commission v. Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, Local 3, 95 A.3d 269, 626 Pa. 115, 2014 WL 2922390, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1594 (Pa. 2014).

95 A.3d 269 (School Reform Commission v. Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, Local 3) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related