School District No. 49 v. Cooper

45 N.W. 618, 29 Neb. 433, 1890 Neb. LEXIS 236
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedApril 29, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 45 N.W. 618 (School District No. 49 v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
School District No. 49 v. Cooper, 45 N.W. 618, 29 Neb. 433, 1890 Neb. LEXIS 236 (Neb. 1890).

Opinion

Noryal, J.

The case is submitted on the motion of the defendant to dismiss the petition in error for the following reasons:

First — Because the order of the district court overruling the objections of the plaintiff in error to the jurisdiction of the said court was not a final order from which proceedings in error will lie.

Second — Because no final judgment was rendered in the action.

The following is a copy of the order entered in the district court:

“ James Cooper y.

School District No. 49.

“Now on this day this cause came on for hearing upon the special appearance of the defendant, objecting to the jurisdiction of the court, and the court, upon consideration thereof, doth overrule said objections. To which ruling-of the court the defendant by counsel excepts, and the exceptions are by the court allowed.”

[434]*434It is patent that this is not a final order. There has been no final disposition of the case by the district court. A petition in error can only be prosecuted from a final order or judgment. (Smith v. Sahler, 1 Neb., 310; Mills v. Miller, 2 Id., 299; Miller v. B. & M. R. R. Co., 7 Id., 227; Scofield v. State National Bank, 8 Id., 17.)

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

Motion sustained.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Egan's Estate
52 N.W.2d 820 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1952)
State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank
267 N.W. 532 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1936)
Goode v. Adams Express Co.
192 Iowa 1164 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1922)
Continental Trust Co. v. Peterson
107 N.W. 786 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1906)
First National Bank v. Gibson
94 N.W. 965 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1903)
Bartels v. Sonnenschein
74 N.W. 417 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Merle & Heaney Manufacturing Co. v. Wallace
67 N.W. 883 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 N.W. 618, 29 Neb. 433, 1890 Neb. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/school-district-no-49-v-cooper-neb-1890.