School District No. 3 v. Bodenhamer

43 Ark. 140
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 15, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 43 Ark. 140 (School District No. 3 v. Bodenhamer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
School District No. 3 v. Bodenhamer, 43 Ark. 140 (Ark. 1884).

Opinion

Smith, J.

This action was begun before a Justice of the Peace to recover a balance of $75 due for teacher’s wages, pursuant to the terms of a written contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant’s directors. The plaintiff hac1*judgment and the School District appealed to the Circuit Court. There, after a motion to dismiss and a demurrer for want of jurisdiction, the defendant declined to contest the matter further in that forum, and allowed judgment to go, and has appealed to us.

By Section 53 of the Common Schools Act of December 7, 1875, each School District is constituted a body corporate, with power to'sue and be sued in any of the courts of the state having competent jurisdiction. And the cause of action was within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Justice of the Peace. J There is no force in the suggestion that the plaintiff’s remedy was mandamus to compel the directors to issue an order upon the County Treasurer for her wages. The writ of mandamus is frequently employed to compel public corporations to perform their duties towards their creditors. But there must first be a judgment to establish the validity and amount of the debt.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of Lead Hill v. Ozark Mountain Regional Public Water Authority
2015 Ark. 360 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2015)
Redd v. Sossamon
868 S.W.2d 466 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)
Rastle v. Marion County Rural School District No. 1
543 S.W.2d 923 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1976)
Shackleford v. Thomas
32 S.W.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1930)
Huie v. Barkman
18 S.W.2d 334 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Ark. 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/school-district-no-3-v-bodenhamer-ark-1884.