School Committee v. Mayor

406 N.E.2d 1314, 10 Mass. App. Ct. 840, 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 1255
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided July 18, 1980·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The interlocutory injunction which was entered in the Superior

Court on June 26, 1980, is vacated (G. L. c. 231, § 118, second par.) for the reason (if no other) that the relevant statutory provisions (some of which are discussed in Pirrone v. Boston, 364 Mass. 403 [1973]), and in particular the provisions of St. 1909, c. 486, § 16, cast substantial doubt on the likelihood that any of the plaintiffs will ultimately succeed on the merits in this action.

So ordered.

Harold J. Carroll, Coiporation Counsel, é- William J. Smith, Assistant Corporation Counsel, for the defendant. Paul F. Kelly for the Boston Association of School Administrators & Supervisors. James S. Tobin for the School Committee of Boston & another. Elizabeth A. Kovalcik for Joseph B. Buckley & another.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

School Committee v. Mayor, 406 N.E.2d 1314, 10 Mass. App. Ct. 840, 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 1255 (Mass. Ct. App. 1980).

406 N.E.2d 1314 (School Committee v. Mayor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Suffolk v. Labor Relations Commission
444 N.E.2d 953 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1983)