School Committee of Revere v. Revere Teachers Ass'n

Massachusetts Appeals Court

School Committee of Revere v. Revere Teachers Ass'n

492 N.E.2d 748, 22 Mass. App. Ct. 929, 1986 Mass. App. LEXIS 1592

DecidedMay 20, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 492 N.E.2d 748 (School Committee of Revere v. Revere Teachers Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

School Committee of Revere v. Revere Teachers Ass'n, 492 N.E.2d 748, 22 Mass. App. Ct. 929, 1986 Mass. App. LEXIS 1592 (Mass. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment is affirmed for the reason, if no other, that the school committee participated in the arbitration hearing without raising any claim before the arbitrator that the collective bargaining agreement had expired. The committee may not claim lack of jurisdiction based on expiration of the agreement where it has not satisfied the statutory requirement of G. L. c. 150C, § 11 (a) (5).

The case was submitted on briefs. Frederick T. Golder for the plaintiff. Americo A. Salini, Jr., for the defendant.

The committee’s contention of a lack of appropriations was raised for the first time on appeal and it does not constitute appellate argument within the meaning of Mass.R. A.P. 16(a) (4), as amended, 367 Mass. 921 (1975).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment is affirmed for the reason, if no other, that the school committee participated in the arbitration hearing without raising any claim before the arbitrator that the collective bargaining agreement had expired. The committee may not claim lack of jurisdiction based on expiration of the agreement where it has not satisfied the statutory requirement of G. L. c. 150C, § 11 (a) (5).

The case was submitted on briefs. Frederick T. Golder for the plaintiff. Americo A. Salini, Jr., for the defendant.

The committee’s contention of a lack of appropriations was raised for the first time on appeal and it does not constitute appellate argument within the meaning of Mass.R. A.P. 16(a) (4), as amended, 367 Mass. 921 (1975).

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 N.E.2d 748, 22 Mass. App. Ct. 929, 1986 Mass. App. LEXIS 1592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/school-committee-of-revere-v-revere-teachers-assn-massappct-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack