Schonfield v. City of Coral Gables

Supreme Court of Florida

Schonfield v. City of Coral Gables

183 So. 2d 682, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3725

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 2, 1966

DocketNo. 34424

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 183 So. 2d 682 (Schonfield v. City of Coral Gables) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schonfield v. City of Coral Gables, 183 So. 2d 682, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3725 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 So. 2d 682, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schonfield-v-city-of-coral-gables-fla-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack