Schonfeld v. Ashare

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schonfeld v. Ashare

1 A.D.2d 702, 148 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3657

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 702 (Schonfeld v. Ashare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schonfeld v. Ashare, 1 A.D.2d 702, 148 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for specific performance of a written contract to sell real property, made by appellants and defendant, an order was made dismissing, for insufficiency, the second and third causes of action pleaded in the amended complaint against respondent. The second cause of action demands specific performance of an alleged oral agreement by respondent, a tenant in the subject premises, to surrender possession of his apartment upon the closing of title. The third cause of action seeks specific performance of an alleged agreement to surrender possession upon the ground that defendant executed the written contract as agent for respondent, her father. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for specific performance of a written contract to sell real property, made by appellants and defendant, an order was made dismissing, for insufficiency, the second and third causes of action pleaded in the amended complaint against respondent. The second cause of action demands specific performance of an alleged oral agreement by respondent, a tenant in the subject premises, to surrender possession of his apartment upon the closing of title. The third cause of action seeks specific performance of an alleged agreement to surrender possession upon the ground that defendant executed the written contract as agent for respondent, her father. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 702, 148 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schonfeld-v-ashare-nyappdiv-1955.