Schomer v. Gonzalez - Individually

Opinion

2 4 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 DWAYNE L. SCHOMER, as_ special Case No.: 3:23-cv-00390-ART-CSD administrator of THE ESTATE OF KEATON 14M. SCHOMER and individually; and BRAYLEN SCHOMER, individually ORDER GRANTING 15 STIPULATION TO EXTEND Plaintiffs, DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS 16 TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF vs. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY "7 ELKO COUNTY: ELKO COUNTY JUDGMENT ; ECF Nos. 1 2 18|| SHERIFF°S OFFICE: SHERIFF AITOR (ECF Nos. 68, 70, 71 and 72) NARVAIZA, individually; UNDERSHERIFF || JUSTIN AIMES, individually; SERGEANT (First Request) MICHAEL SILVA, individually, DEPUTY 20 || TREVOR L. SNEED, individually, DEPUTY DOUGLAS HOLLADAY, | individually; DEPUTY ERIKA GONZALES: DEPUTY DAVID HATCH, individually, DEPUTY 22] HANNAH KENDALL, individually MEDALLUS & VACHAROTHONE LTD; RACHOT VACHAROTHONE, individually; BAILEY POWELL, 24] individually, GEOFFREY FISHER, individually; MERCEDES COCHRELL, 25|| individually; LETISCYA CHACON, individually; DOE SUPERVISORS I-X; DOE DEPUTIES I-X; DOE MEDICAL STAFF I-X: and ROE ENTITIES I-X, 27 Defendants. eee

KSON, THORPE & LTD.

1 COME NOW, all parties by their counsel as stated below, and hereby agree and jointly 2 || stipulate to the following: 3 1. On June 18, 2025, Silva filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 68); 4|| Medallus Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 70); Elko County 5 || Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 71); and Elko Deputy 6 || Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 72). 7 2. On June 25, 2025, Elko County Defendants filed a Joinder to Silva’s Motion 8 || (ECF No. 73) and a Joinder to the Elko Deputy Defendants’ Motion (ECF No. 74); and Silva 9 || filed a Joinder to the Elko County Defendants’ Motion (ECF No. 75) and a Joinder to the 10} Elko Deputy Defendants’ Motion (ECF No. 76). 11 3. While Plaintiffs’ responses to the Motions and Joinders were originally due on 12 | July 9, 2025, the Parties initially stipulated to extend the deadline to September 8, 2025 (ECF 13 |} No. 77), and the Court granted same (ECF No. 78). Thereafter, the parties stipulated to an 14 || additional one-week extension (ECF No. 79), which the Court granted (ECF No. 80), moving 15 || the deadline to September 15, 2025. 16 4. Plaintiffs filed their opposition briefing (ECF Nos. 81, 82, 83 and 84) on 17 |} September 15, 2025, and Defendants’ reply briefing is now due on September 29, 2025, 18 per LR 7-2(b). 19 5. Defendants have jointly requested, and Plaintiffs have graciously agreed, to 20 || a 25-day extension of the current reply deadline from September 29, 2025, until October 24, 21 | 2025, to allow Defendants to fully address the detailed points and authorities presented in 22 || Plaintiffs’ opposition briefing and distill the issues presented to the Court. 23 6. Therefore, the Parties request that the deadline for Defendants’ reply briefing 24 || in support of the pending Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 68, 70, 71 and 72) in 25 || response to Plaintiffs Response Briefs (ECF Nos. 81, 82, 83 and 84) be extended from 26 || September 29, 2025, until October 24, 2025. 27 | /// 28 | ///

LTD.

1 7. This is the first request to extend the deadline for these reply briefs, and the 2 || Parties represent that the stipulation is entered into good faith and not for the purposes of 3 || undue delay. 4 DATED this 18" day of September, 2025. 5 ERICKSON, THORPE & SWAINSTON, LTD. 7 /s/ Brent Ryman BRENT L. RYMAN, ESQ. (4008648) 8 ERICKSON, THORPE & SWAINSTON, LTD. 1885 South Arlington Ave., Suite 205 9 Reno, Nevada 89509 (775) 786-3930 10 Attorneys for Elko County Deputy Defendants 11 |) /// 12 DATED this 18" day of September, 2025. 13 CLARK HILL PLLC 14 15 /s/ Paola Armeni PAOLA M. ARMENTI, ESQ. (#008357) 16 WILLIAM D. SCHULLER, ESQ. (#011271) CLARK HILL PLLC 17 1700 S. Pavilion Center Drive, Suite 500 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 18 (702) 862-8300 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 19 20 | /// 21 DATED this 18" day of September, 2025. 22 RENCHER ANJEWIERDEN 23 24 /s/ Ben Lusty BENJAMIN K. LUSTY, ESQ., pro hac vice 25 RENCHER ANJEWIERDEN 460 South 400 East 26 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Attorneys for Medallus Defendants 27 28 | /// KSON, THORPE& LTD.

1 DATED this 18" day of September, 2025. 2 MARQUIS AURBACH 4 /s/ Craig Anderson CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ. (#006882) 5 KADEN P. KILLPACK, ESQ. (#016560) MARQUIS AURBACH 6 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 7 Attorneys for Elko County Sheriff Defendants 8 yf /// 9 DATED this 18" day of September, 2025. 10 GOICOECHEA, DIGRAZIA, COYLE & STANTON 11 12 /s/ David M. Stanton DAVID M. STANTON, ESQ. (#004389) 13 GOICOECHEA, DIGRAZIA, COYLE & STANTON 530 Idaho Street 14 Elko, Nevada 89801 Attorneys for Defendant Silva 15 16 | /// 17 || /// 18 |] /// 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 DATED this 19th day of September, 2025. 21 22 A, ~ placect jd 23 Anne R. Traum 24 United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 KSON, THORPE & LTD.