Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Scholtes v. State

Scholtes v. State

27 So. 3d 175, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1091, 2010 WL 366603
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 3, 2010
Docket4D07-3690
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 So. 3d 175 (Scholtes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scholtes v. State, 27 So. 3d 175, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1091, 2010 WL 366603 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). In this appeal pursuant to Anders, 1 Appellant’s pro se brief raises issues of an involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by the filing of a motion to withdraw his plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to assert such issues in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
1

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ruiz v. State
108 So. 3d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 So. 3d 175, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1091, 2010 WL 366603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scholtes-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.