Schollmeyer v. Van Buskirk

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Schollmeyer v. Van Buskirk

1913 OK 119, 130 P. 138, 35 Okla. 439, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 604

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 11, 1913

Docket4706

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1913 OK 119 (Schollmeyer v. Van Buskirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schollmeyer v. Van Buskirk, 1913 OK 119, 130 P. 138, 35 Okla. 439, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 604 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLIAMS', J.

This proceeding in error seeks to review, by means of a transcript, a judgment rendered in the trial court on May 24, 1912.

A proceeding in error, commenced in this court after the expiration of six months from the rendering of said judgment or the overruling of a motion for a new trial, must be dismissed.

The action of the lower court in overruling a motion for a new trial is not brought to this court by means of a transcript. Richardson et vir v. Beidleman et al., 33 Okla. 463, 126 Pac. 816, 818.

The proceeding in error must be dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI