Schollmeyer v. Van Buskirk

1913 OK 119, 130 P. 138, 35 Okla. 439, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 604
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 11, 1913·No. 4706·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

WILLIAMS', J.

This proceeding in error seeks to review, by means of a transcript, a judgment rendered in the trial court on May 24, 1912.

A proceeding in error, commenced in this court after the expiration of six months from the rendering of said judgment or the overruling of a motion for a new trial, must be dismissed.

The action of the lower court in overruling a motion for a new trial is not brought to this court by means of a transcript. Richardson et vir v. Beidleman et al., 33 Okla. 463, 126 Pac. 816, 818.

The proceeding in error must be dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schollmeyer v. Van Buskirk, 1913 OK 119, 130 P. 138, 35 Okla. 439, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 604 (Okla. 1913).

1913 OK 119 (Schollmeyer v. Van Buskirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Nat. Bank of Wetumika v. Hale-Halsell Co.
1935 OK 25 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Blackmon v. Reid
1934 OK 730 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Ham v. Veasey
1920 OK 286 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
University Realty Co. v. English
1913 OK 674 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)