Scholle v. Scholle

4 N.Y.S. 809, 56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 399, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1725

This text of 4 N.Y.S. 809 (Scholle v. Scholle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scholle v. Scholle, 4 N.Y.S. 809, 56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 399, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1725 (superctny 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The orders are severally affirmed upon the opinion of J udge Ereedman delivered below. The receipts of Seholle brothers, admitting the title of Raynor to three undivided tenths, have great effect in determining that probably the parties to the deed of Raynor to Phillips did not intend that it should convey the three-tenths referred to, and that there was a clerical omission from the deed. Orders severally affirmed, with §10 costs in each, with the disbursements to be taxed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.Y.S. 809, 56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 399, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scholle-v-scholle-superctny-1889.