Scholl v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES DIVISION
This text of 684 F. Supp. 246 (Scholl v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES DIVISION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court, having read all the cases submitted by counsel, finds the reasoning most persuasive in Patten v. Lederle Laboratories, 655 F.Supp. 745 (D.Utah, 1987).
Neither the statute, congressional intent, or logic mandate a holding that the federal government has preempted state tort law in this area.
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motions For Partial Summary Judgment are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
684 F. Supp. 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scholl-v-lederle-laboratories-division-azd-1987.