Scholfield v. Pope

103 Ill. 138
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 103 Ill. 138 (Scholfield v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scholfield v. Pope, 103 Ill. 138 (Ill. 1882).

Opinion

Dickey, J.:

This motion does not contain, nor is it accompanied by, any statement of the ground upon which the question of jurisdiction is to arise. We can not go to the record to search for some possible ground for the motion. A proper statement should be made. We do not allow or deny the motion, but simply refuse to entertain it at all. The motion can be renewed on a proper statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Greenville v. Nowlan
279 Ill. App. 311 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1935)
Jackson v. Barrett
86 P. 270 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1906)
State v. Estes
51 P. 77 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Ill. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scholfield-v-pope-ill-1882.