Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Schofield's Sons Co. v. Georgia Quincy Granite Co.

Schofield's Sons Co. v. Georgia Quincy Granite Co.

121 S.E. 137, 31 Ga. App. 10, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 699
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 3, 1923
Docket14487
StatusPublished

This text of 121 S.E. 137 (Schofield's Sons Co. v. Georgia Quincy Granite Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schofield's Sons Co. v. Georgia Quincy Granite Co., 121 S.E. 137, 31 Ga. App. 10, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 699 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinions

Bloodworth, J.

The court did not err in dismissing on oral motion the petition as amended “on the ground that it set forth no cause of action.”

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur. J ones, Parle & J ohnston, for plaintiff. John B. L. Smith, Grady G. Harris, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kiser Co. v. Padrick
118 S.E. 791 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 S.E. 137, 31 Ga. App. 10, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schofields-sons-co-v-georgia-quincy-granite-co-gactapp-1923.