Schofield v. Mechanics Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schofield v. Mechanics Bank

168 A.D. 959

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D. 959 (Schofield v. Mechanics Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schofield v. Mechanics Bank, 168 A.D. 959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The record proof is that a judgment was recovered and execution issued and returned unsatisfied on November 24, 1913. The adjudication in bankruptcy was made on January 1, 1914. Kiendl v. Dubroff (136 App. Div. 8) is decisive of this appeal. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The record proof is that a judgment was recovered and execution issued and returned unsatisfied on November 24, 1913. The adjudication in bankruptcy was made on January 1, 1914. Kiendl v. Dubroff (136 App. Div. 8) is decisive of this appeal. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D. 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schofield-v-mechanics-bank-nyappdiv-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack