Schofield v. Baker

W.D. Washington

Schofield v. Baker

242 F. 657, 1917 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1254

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington

DecidedMay 29, 1917

DocketNo. 1-E

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 242 F. 657 (Schofield v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schofield v. Baker, 242 F. 657, 1917 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1254 (W.D. Wash. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

NETERER, District Judge.

On March 12, 1914, opinion directing decree for plaintiff was filed in this cause. 212 Fed. 504. Decree was entered April 1st following. Plaintiff filed a cost bill, with notice of acceptance of service on April 6, 1914. Objections to cost bill were filed April 9, 1914. The clerk disallowed the taxation of all costs other than the clerk’s costs, on the ground that a memorandum of costs was not served and filed within five days after the rendition of the decision of the court, pursuant to rule 70. Appeal from the clerk’s disallowance of costs is presented to the court.

[1,2] Rule 70 provides that a party in whose favor a judgment is rendered, and who claims his costs shall within five days after' rendition of the verdict, or after notice of the decision of the court, file a memorandum of costs, and in case of failure to serve and file such memorandum and notice all costs other than clerk’s costs shall be deemed waived. In this rule “decision” bears the same relation to a nonjury cause as does “verdict” to a jury cause. A general verdict is one by which the jury pronounce at the same time on the fact and the law, either in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant. 4 Blackstone’s Commentaries, 461. A verdict is a conclusion upon the facts, and in effect a direction for judgment. The findings of the court upon the facts in a nonjury case shall be deemed1 a verdict under the Washington statute (Remington & Ballinger’s Code, vol. 1. § 368). Willey v. Morrow, 1 Wash. T. 478; Enos v. Wilcox, 3 Wash. 44, 28 Pac. 364. Verdict and decision bear the same relation to the respective cases. The decision of a court is, among other things, an order for judgment. It actually determines the judgment to be entered. Garr, Scott & Co. v. Spaulding, 2 N. D. 414, 51 N. W. 867.

The question at issue to be determined is whether the memorandum filed merely expressed views upon the question in controversy, or whether it was a decision concluding upon the facts. In re Winslow Estate, 12 Misc. Rep. 254, 34 N. Y. Supp. 637; Kidd v. McCracken, 105 Tex. 383, 150 S. W. 885. An examination of the memorandum filed (212 Fed. 504, supra) is conclusive that the decision concludes the facts, and a decree is directed upon the facts accordingly.

The decision of the clerk is sustained1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NETERER, District Judge.

On March 12, 1914, opinion directing decree for plaintiff was filed in this cause. 212 Fed. 504. Decree was entered April 1st following. Plaintiff filed a cost bill, with notice of acceptance of service on April 6, 1914. Objections to cost bill were filed April 9, 1914. The clerk disallowed the taxation of all costs other than the clerk’s costs, on the ground that a memorandum of costs was not served and filed within five days after the rendition of the decision of the court, pursuant to rule 70. Appeal from the clerk’s disallowance of costs is presented to the court.

[1,2] Rule 70 provides that a party in whose favor a judgment is rendered, and who claims his costs shall within five days after' rendition of the verdict, or after notice of the decision of the court, file a memorandum of costs, and in case of failure to serve and file such memorandum and notice all costs other than clerk’s costs shall be deemed waived. In this rule “decision” bears the same relation to a nonjury cause as does “verdict” to a jury cause. A general verdict is one by which the jury pronounce at the same time on the fact and the law, either in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant. 4 Blackstone’s Commentaries, 461. A verdict is a conclusion upon the facts, and in effect a direction for judgment. The findings of the court upon the facts in a nonjury case shall be deemed1 a verdict under the Washington statute (Remington & Ballinger’s Code, vol. 1. § 368). Willey v. Morrow, 1 Wash. T. 478; Enos v. Wilcox, 3 Wash. 44, 28 Pac. 364. Verdict and decision bear the same relation to the respective cases. The decision of a court is, among other things, an order for judgment. It actually determines the judgment to be entered. Garr, Scott & Co. v. Spaulding, 2 N. D. 414, 51 N. W. 867.

The question at issue to be determined is whether the memorandum filed merely expressed views upon the question in controversy, or whether it was a decision concluding upon the facts. In re Winslow Estate, 12 Misc. Rep. 254, 34 N. Y. Supp. 637; Kidd v. McCracken, 105 Tex. 383, 150 S. W. 885. An examination of the memorandum filed (212 Fed. 504, supra) is conclusive that the decision concludes the facts, and a decree is directed upon the facts accordingly.

The decision of the clerk is sustained1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 F. 657, 1917 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schofield-v-baker-wawd-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack