Schoff v. Laithe

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Schoff v. Laithe

58 N.H. 503

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedAugust 5, 1878

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 N.H. 503 (Schoff v. Laithe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schoff v. Laithe, 58 N.H. 503 (N.H. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Stanley, J.

A verdict is not set aside on the ground that the prevailing party was allowed to open and close, unless it is shown that the other party has suffered actual injustice. Hardy v. Merrill, 56 N. H. 227, 234; Day v. Woodworth, 13 How. 363, 370; Doe v. Brayne, 5 M. G. & S. 655; Bird v. Higginson, 2 A. & E. 177.

Judgment on the verdict.

Doe, C. J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley, J.

A verdict is not set aside on the ground that the prevailing party was allowed to open and close, unless it is shown that the other party has suffered actual injustice. Hardy v. Merrill, 56 N. H. 227, 234; Day v. Woodworth, 13 How. 363, 370; Doe v. Brayne, 5 M. G. & S. 655; Bird v. Higginson, 2 A. & E. 177.

Judgment on the verdict.

Doe, C. J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.H. 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoff-v-laithe-nh-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack