Schofer v. Davis & Stearns, Inc.
This text of 261 A.D. 881 (Schofer v. Davis & Stearns, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: We think the verdict of no cause for action was clearly against the weight of the evidence. Moreover, the court erred in excluding Item 77-P of the Specifications relating to the “ Protection of Traffic ” under the defendant’s contract. This error of itself requires a reversal of the judgment and order appealed from. (McMahon v. Second Avenue Railroad Company, 75 N. Y. 231, 235, 239. See, also, Kinnie v. Town of Morristown, 184 App. Div. 408.) All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The judgment is for defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff by reason of an automobile in which she was a passenger colliding with concrete pipes in a public highway. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 881, 25 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schofer-v-davis-stearns-inc-nyappdiv-1941.