Schoenrogge v. Department of Justice

Federal Circuit

Schoenrogge v. Department of Justice

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJuly 25, 2011

Docket2011-3126

StatusUnpublished

This text of Schoenrogge v. Department of Justice (Schoenrogge v. Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schoenrogge v. Department of Justice, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit TODD J. SCHOENROGGE, Petiti0ner, V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Resp0ndent. 2011-3126, -3143 Petitions for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case nos. DA333U090467-C-1 and DA1221100611-W-1. ON MOTION ORDER The Depa1'tment of Justice moves to consolidate the above-captioned cases Sch0enr0gge opposes Upon consideration thereof IT ls ORDERED THAT:

SCHOENROGGE V. JUSTICE 2 (1) The motion is granted The revised 0fEcia1 cap- tion is reflected above (2) Respondent’s brief is due 21 days after the date of this order or the filing of petitioners brief in appeal no. 2011~3143, whichever is 1ater. FoR THE CoURT JUL 25 2911 /s/ J an Horba1y Date Jan Horbaly l Clerk ccc Michael P. Goodn1an, Esq. B. Todd J. Schoenr0gge 93 'é‘3.,-, §eF ge EALS FOR RCU|T 324 JUL 25 2011 }AN HORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit TODD J. SCHOENROGGE, Petiti0ner, V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Resp0ndent. 2011-3126, -3143 Petitions for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case nos. DA333U090467-C-1 and DA1221100611-W-1. ON MOTION ORDER The Depa1'tment of Justice moves to consolidate the above-captioned cases Sch0enr0gge opposes Upon consideration thereof IT ls ORDERED THAT:

SCHOENROGGE V. JUSTICE 2 (1) The motion is granted The revised 0fEcia1 cap- tion is reflected above (2) Respondent’s brief is due 21 days after the date of this order or the filing of petitioners brief in appeal no. 2011~3143, whichever is 1ater. FoR THE CoURT JUL 25 2911 /s/ J an Horba1y Date Jan Horbaly l Clerk ccc Michael P. Goodn1an, Esq. B. Todd J. Schoenr0gge 93 'é‘3.,-, §eF ge EALS FOR RCU|T 324 JUL 25 2011 }AN HORBALY CLERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Schoenrogge v. Department of Justice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoenrogge-v-department-of-justice-cafc-2011.