Schoenle v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Schoenle v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.

201 Ill. App. 5, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 1075

DecidedOctober 13, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 201 Ill. App. 5 (Schoenle v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schoenle v. Great Eastern Casualty Co., 201 Ill. App. 5, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 1075 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Graves

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Insurance—when knowledge by agent of facts concerning applicant which are ground for forfeiture question for jury. In an action on. an accident insurance policy, held a question for the jury whether the agent knew facts concerning the applicant at the time of issuance of the policy which, had he not known them, would 'have been ground for forfeiture. 4. Insurance, § 686*—when manner of death of insured question for jury. In an action on an accident insurance policy, the question whether the insured was a temperate man and met his death by accident or as a result of alcoholism, held for the jury, the evidence being conflicting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Graves

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Insurance—when knowledge by agent of facts concerning applicant which are ground for forfeiture question for jury. In an action on. an accident insurance policy, held a question for the jury whether the agent knew facts concerning the applicant at the time of issuance of the policy which, had he not known them, would 'have been ground for forfeiture. 4. Insurance, § 686*—when manner of death of insured question for jury. In an action on an accident insurance policy, the question whether the insured was a temperate man and met his death by accident or as a result of alcoholism, held for the jury, the evidence being conflicting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 Ill. App. 5, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 1075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoenle-v-great-eastern-casualty-co-illappct-1915.