Schoengold v. Bier
This text of 268 A.D. 832 (Schoengold v. Bier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for the specific performance of a trust indenture and for an accounting thereunder, interlocutory judgment in favor of the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, .with costs. The objection that the decision does not conform to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act is untenable. The decision is equivalent to express findings of fact in favor of the plaintiff on each and all of the material facts alleged in the amended complaint. Any other determination upon this record would be contrary to the weight of the evidence. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 832, 49 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoengold-v-bier-nyappdiv-1944.