Schoenfeld v. Stiens
82 F.2d 1019, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3244
This text of 82 F.2d 1019 (Schoenfeld v. Stiens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schoenfeld v. Stiens, 82 F.2d 1019, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3244 (2d Cir. 1936).
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of In re Mertens (C.C.A.) 142 F. 445, In re Reilly (C.C.A.) 258 F. 121, and Henkin v. Fousek (C.C.A.) 267 F. 557.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Mertens
142 F. 445 (Second Circuit, 1905)
Knappenburg v. Rowan
258 F. 121 (Second Circuit, 1919)
Henkin v. Fousek
267 F. 557 (Eighth Circuit, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
82 F.2d 1019, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoenfeld-v-stiens-ca2-1936.