Schoenfeld v. PAROLE BD.
735 N.W.2d 279, 479 Mich. 862, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 1713
Opinion
Daniel Henry SCHOENFELD, Petitioner,
v.
PAROLE BOARD, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are *280 not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schoenfeld v. PAROLE BD., 735 N.W.2d 279, 479 Mich. 862, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 1713 (Mich. 2007).
735 N.W.2d 279 (Schoenfeld v. PAROLE BD.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.