Schoenfeld v. Klein

5 A.D.2d 848, 171 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6952

This text of 5 A.D.2d 848 (Schoenfeld v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schoenfeld v. Klein, 5 A.D.2d 848, 171 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion made pursuant to section 489 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 191 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for leave to take an inquest and directing them to accept respondent’s answer. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without prejudice, however, to a timely application by respondent to open his default upon a proper showing. In our opinion, this record cannot support the determination made at Special Term, since respondent has shown neither a meritorious defense nor an acceptable excuse for his default (cf. Seehase v. Webster, 284 App. Div. 1028; Blasser v. Morrisania Milk Co., 243 App. Div. 281).

Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blasser v. Morrisania Milk Co.
243 A.D. 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Seehase v. Webster
284 A.D. 1028 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.2d 848, 171 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoenfeld-v-klein-nyappdiv-1958.