Schoenfeld v. Globe Storage & Carpet Cleaning Co.
121 N.Y.S. 332
This text of 121 N.Y.S. 332 (Schoenfeld v. Globe Storage & Carpet Cleaning Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schoenfeld v. Globe Storage & Carpet Cleaning Co., 121 N.Y.S. 332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
Opinion
It appears by the evidence that the rug in question belongs, not to the plaintiff, but to his wife. Plaintiff took no part .in the transaction.
Hence the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 N.Y.S. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoenfeld-v-globe-storage-carpet-cleaning-co-nyappterm-1910.