Schoenfeld v. Atomic Products Corp.
323 N.E.2d 710, 35 N.Y.2d 880, 364 N.Y.S.2d 177, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1145
Opinion
Order reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division with the added comment that a stipulation alone for a jury trial of all issues might not be sufficient, but in this case the stipulation had been converted into an order of the court.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schoenfeld v. Atomic Products Corp., 323 N.E.2d 710, 35 N.Y.2d 880, 364 N.Y.S.2d 177, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1145 (N.Y. 1974).
323 N.E.2d 710 (Schoenfeld v. Atomic Products Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rogers v. Niforatos
57 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Kremens v. Minc
55 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Greenberg v. New York City Planning Commission
48 A.D.2d 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)