Schoenbachler v. Arterburn
This text of 84 S.W.2d 9 (Schoenbachler v. Arterburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
Dismissing appeal.
Norburn Arterburn has recovered judgment against *274 Joseph M. Schoenbachler for $444 rent for the year 1932, and the latter is here on appeal granted by the lower court. Since the amount in controversy is less than $500, the circuit court was without jurisdiction to' grant, and this court is without jurisdiction to hear and •to determine the appeal, and on the authority of Childers et al. v. Ratliff et al,, 164 Ky. 123, 175 S. W. 25, the appeal must be dismissed.
It is contended, however, by counsel for Mr. Schoenbachler that an attachment for rent for another year in a sum sufficient to give the • court jurisdiction was involved. No final action was taken with reference to the .attachment, and therefore the only amount involved is the judgment for 1932 rent.
Wherefore the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 S.W.2d 9, 260 Ky. 273, 1935 Ky. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoenbachler-v-arterburn-kyctapphigh-1935.