Schoenbach v. VMS Realty, Inc.
This text of 503 So. 2d 382 (Schoenbach v. VMS Realty, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
A chair used to hold a door open, which the plaintiff plainly saw but tripped over owing to an admitted momentary distraction was not a dangerous condition, where there was sufficient space and lighting for easy passage. See Storr v. Proctor, 490 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 500 So.2d 546 (Fla.1986); Cassel v. Price, 396 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 407 So.2d 1102 (1981).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 So. 2d 382, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 545, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoenbach-v-vms-realty-inc-fladistctapp-1987.