Schoen v. Houghton
50 Cal. 528
Opinion
We are of opinion that the circumstances attending the assignment to the plaintiff of the note of September 1, 1871, as found by the court below, are not, under the rules applicable to the transfer of negotiable paper, sufficient to impugn the title of the plaintiff as being a bona fide holder for value.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schoen v. Houghton, 50 Cal. 528 (Cal. 1875).
50 Cal. 528 (Schoen v. Houghton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morgan v. Reasor Corp.
447 P.2d 638 (California Supreme Court, 1968)
Witty v. Clinch
279 P. 797 (California Supreme Court, 1929)
Smith v. Armstrong
260 P. 347 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
Wilson's Adm'r v. Holt
91 Ala. 204 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)