Schoen v. Chase Manhattan Automotive Finance Corp.
This text of 274 A.D.2d 345 (Schoen v. Chase Manhattan Automotive Finance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered March 25, 1999, which granted defendant Goldberg’s cross-motion to transfer venue to Nassau County, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the cross-motion denied.
The vague and conclusory allegations offered in support of defendant Goldberg’s cross-motion were insufficient to warrant a change of venue. We note in this regard that, among other deficiencies, defendant’s submissions failed to identify a single non-party witness who has expressed any inconvenience in having to testify in New York County (compare, Lloyd v National Propane Corp., 271 AD2d 202). Nor did defendant indicate the home or work addresses of the various witnesses. Accordingly, Supreme Court erred in granting the cross mo[346]*346tion. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D.2d 345, 711 N.Y.S.2d 15, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoen-v-chase-manhattan-automotive-finance-corp-nyappdiv-2000.