Schoeman v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

Docket2009-3297

StatusUnpublished

This text of Schoeman v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Schoeman v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schoeman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia|. United States Court of Appeals for the Federa| Circuit 2009-3297 PATR|CiA SCHOE|ViAN, 4 Petitioner, v. MERlT SYSTEMS PROTECTlON BOARD, Respondent, and ' OFF|CE OF PERSONNEL |V|ANAGEIV|ENT, |ntervenor. Petition for review of the |Vierit Systems Protection Board in AT0831090378-|-1. ON |V|OT|ON O R D E R The Office of Personne| |Vianagement moves for a 22-day extension of time, until April 6, 2010, to 1°:|e its brief Schoeman and iV|erit Systems Protection Board consent. Upon consideration thereof, |T |S ORDERED THAT: (‘i) The motion is granted N0 further extensions should be anticipated. (2) . The petitioner’s reply brief is due within 14 days of service of OPM’s brief_ s FOR THE COURT HAR 1 5 mm /s/Jan Horbaiv Date ° Jan Horba|y C|erk _ ca oa\/id u.Fiers1,Esq. u_s_m¥§5F§§¢,FmumR Stephanie Con|ey, Esq. T"E *W-C'RCU*T Jane W_ Vanneman, Esq. HAR 1 6 mm s21 __ .iAN HORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia|. United States Court of Appeals for the Federa| Circuit 2009-3297 PATR|CiA SCHOE|ViAN, 4 Petitioner, v. MERlT SYSTEMS PROTECTlON BOARD, Respondent, and ' OFF|CE OF PERSONNEL |V|ANAGEIV|ENT, |ntervenor. Petition for review of the |Vierit Systems Protection Board in AT0831090378-|-1. ON |V|OT|ON O R D E R The Office of Personne| |Vianagement moves for a 22-day extension of time, until April 6, 2010, to 1°:|e its brief Schoeman and iV|erit Systems Protection Board consent. Upon consideration thereof, |T |S ORDERED THAT: (‘i) The motion is granted N0 further extensions should be anticipated. (2) . The petitioner’s reply brief is due within 14 days of service of OPM’s brief_ s FOR THE COURT HAR 1 5 mm /s/Jan Horbaiv Date ° Jan Horba|y C|erk _ ca oa\/id u.Fiers1,Esq. u_s_m¥§5F§§¢,FmumR Stephanie Con|ey, Esq. T"E *W-C'RCU*T Jane W_ Vanneman, Esq. HAR 1 6 mm s21 __ .iAN HORBALY CLERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Schoeman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoeman-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2010.